Afterword
(On the difference between TC's and Dauvé's theory of communisation: ever-present and invariant possibility, or specific form which the communist revolution must take in the current cycle of struggle.)
Endnotes: 01/2008 (Zeitschrift: 208-220)
Love of Labour? Love of Labour Lost...
(Dauvé and Nesic's historical account challenges the thesis that the self-identification of the proletarian as producer has been the decisive cause of its defeats.)
Endnotes: 01/2008 (Zeitschrift: 104-153)
Human, all too human?
(Dauvé criticises TC for proposing a self-referential historical model that unjustifiably privileges the current cycle of struggles, while denying proletarian actors of the past all capacity for action not completely determined by the ...)
Endnotes: 01/2008 (Zeitschrift: 90-102)
Normative History and the Communist Essence of the Proletariat
(In their critique of When Insurrections Die, TC attack Dauvé's "normative" perspective, in which actual revolutions are counter-posed to what they could and should have been, that is, to a never-completely-spelled-out formula of a genuine communist..)
Endnotes: 01/2008 (Zeitschrift: 76-89)
When Insurrections Die
(Dauvé shows how the wave of proletarian revolts in the first half of the twentieth century failed: either because they were crushed by the vicissitudes of war and ideology, or because their "victories" took the form of counter-revolutions themselves.)
Endnotes: 01/2008 (Zeitschrift: 20-75)
Bring out your dead
(An Introduction to the debate between Théorie Communiste (TC) and Troploin (Dauvé & Nesic) concerning how to theorise the history and actuality of class struggle and revolution in the capitalist epoch.)
Endnotes: 01/2008 (Zeitschrift: 2-18)